01397cam a2200133 a 4500020002300000020001500023082002000038100002200058245007100080260004400151300003500195505091900230650011401149  a9780300172317 (hb)  a030017231100a342.730858bSOL1 aSolove, Daniel J.10aNothing to hide bthe false tradeoff between privacy and security   aNew Haven bYale University Pressc2011  aix, 245 p. b: ill. c; 25 cm.0 aThe nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy. 0aLaw enforcementaNational securityvLaw enforcementvPendulum argumentvProblem strategyvProtect privacyvFC