<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01443cam a2200157 a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780300172317 (hb)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0300172311</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">342.730858</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">SOL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Solove, Daniel J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Nothing to hide </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">the false tradeoff between privacy and security </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">New Haven </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Yale University Press</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ix, 245 p. </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">: ill. </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">; 25 cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Law enforcement</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">National security</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Law enforcement</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Pendulum argument</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Problem strategy</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Protect privacy</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">FC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">RIU</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RIU</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2013-04-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Purchased: Amazon. Com</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">1635.43</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">342.730858 SOL</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">8118</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2013-04-08 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-02-21</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">8581</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">8581</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
